1.1 Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease (CLD)

DOPTELET is indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure.

1.2 Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

DOPTELET is indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia who have had an insufficient response to a previous treatment.

2.1 Recommended Dosage for Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

Begin DOPTELET dosing 10 to 13 days prior to the scheduled procedure. The recommended daily dose of DOPTELET is based on the patient’s platelet count prior to the scheduled procedure (see Table 1). Patients should undergo their procedure 5 to 8 days after the last dose of DOPTELET.

DOPTELET should be taken orally once daily for 5 consecutive days with food. In the case of a missed dose, patients should take the next dose of DOPTELET as soon as they remember. Patients should not take two doses at one time to make up for a missed dose, and should take the next dose at the usual time the next day; all 5 days of dosing should be completed.

Table 1: Recommended Dose and Duration in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Scheduled to Undergo a Procedure

DOPTELET has been investigated only as a single 5-day once daily dosing regimen in clinical trials in patients with chronic liver disease [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. DOPTELET should not be administered to patients with chronic liver disease in an attempt to normalize platelet counts.

Monitoring: Obtain a platelet count prior to administration of DOPTELET therapy and on the day of a procedure to ensure an adequate increase in platelet count.

2.2 Recommended Dosage for Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Use the lowest dose of DOPTELET needed to achieve and maintain a platelet count greater than or equal to 50×109/L as necessary to reduce the risk for bleeding. Dose adjustments are based on platelet count response. Do not use DOPTELET to normalize platelet counts.

Initial Dose Regimen: Begin DOPTELET at a starting dose of 20 mg (1 tablet) once daily with food.

Monitoring: After initiating therapy with DOPTELET, assess platelet counts weekly until a stable platelet count greater than or equal to 50×109/L has been achieved, and then obtain platelet counts monthly thereafter. Obtain platelet counts weekly for at least 4 weeks following discontinuation of DOPTELET.

Dose adjustments (see Table 2 and Table 3) are based on the platelet count response. Do not exceed a daily dose of 40 mg (2 tablets).

Table 2: DOPTELET Dose Adjustments for Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Table 3: DOPTELET Dose Levels for Titration in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

*Initial dose regimen for all patients except those taking Moderate or Strong Dual Inducers or Moderate or Strong Dual Inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4.

In the case of a missed dose, patients should take the missed dose of DOPTELET as soon as they remember. Patients should not take two doses at one time to make up for a missed dose, and should take the next dose per the current regimen.

Discontinuation: Discontinue DOPTELET if the platelet count does not increase to greater than or equal to 50×109/L after 4 weeks of dosing at the maximum dose of 40 mg once daily. Discontinue DOPTELET if the platelet count is greater than 400×109/L after 2 weeks of dosing at 20 mg once weekly.

2.3 Recommended Dosage with Concomitant Moderate or Strong Dual Inducers or Inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

The recommended starting doses of DOPTELET in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia receiving concomitant medications are summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: DOPTELET Recommended Starting Dose for Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Based on Concomitant Medications

5.1 Thrombotic/Thromboembolic Complications

DOPTELET is a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist and TPO receptor agonists have been associated with thrombotic and thromboembolic complications in patients with chronic liver disease or chronic immune thrombocytopenia. In patients with chronic liver disease, thromboembolic events (portal vein thrombosis) occurred in 0.4% (1/274) of patients receiving DOPTELET. In patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia, thromboembolic events (arterial or venous) occurred in 7% (9/128) of patients receiving DOPTELET.

Consider the potential increased thrombotic risk when administering DOPTELET to patients with known risk factors for thromboembolism, including genetic prothrombotic conditions (e.g., Factor V Leiden, Prothrombin 20210A, Antithrombin deficiency or Protein C or S deficiency).

DOPTELET should not be administered to patients with chronic liver disease or chronic immune thrombocytopenia in an attempt to normalize platelet counts. Monitor platelet counts and follow the dosing guidelines to achieve target platelet counts [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)]. Monitor patients receiving DOPTELET for signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events and institute treatment promptly.

6.1 Clinical Trial Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.

Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

The safety of DOPTELET was evaluated in two international, identically designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, ADAPT-1 and ADAPT-2, in which 430 patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia received either DOPTELET (n=274) or placebo (n=156) daily for 5 days prior to a scheduled procedure, and had 1 post-dose safety assessment. Patients were divided into two groups based on their mean platelet count at baseline:

• Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort (less than 40×109/L) who received DOPTELET 60 mg once daily for 5 days
  
• High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort (40 to less than 50×109/L) who received DOPTELET 40 mg once daily for 5 days

The majority of patients were males (65%) and median subject age was 58 years (ranging from 19-86 years of age). The racial and ethnic distribution was White (60%), Asian (33%), Black (3%) and Other (3%).

The most common adverse reactions (those occurring in ≥3% of patients) in the DOPTELET-treated groups (60 mg or 40 mg) across the pooled data from the two trials are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5: Adverse Reactions with a Frequency ≥3% in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Treated with DOPTELET – Pooled Data ADAPT-1 and ADAPT-2

For the Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the incidence of serious adverse reactions was 7% (11/159) in the 60 mg DOPTELET treatment group. For the High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the incidence of serious adverse reactions was 8% (9/115) in the 40 mg DOPTELET treatment group. The most common serious adverse reaction reported with DOPTELET was hyponatremia. Two DOPTELET-treated patients (0.7%) developed hyponatremia.

Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of DOPTELET were anemia, pyrexia, and myalgia; each was reported in a single (0.4%) patient in the DOPTELET (60 mg) treatment group.

Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

The safety of DOPTELET was evaluated in four clinical trials in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: two Phase 3 trials (one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, and one randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial) and two Phase 2 trials (one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, trial, and one open-label extension trial) in 161 patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia in both the double-blind and open-label extension phases.

The pooled safety data from these four clinical trials includes 128 patients who received 2.5 to 40 mg of DOPTELET once daily for a median duration of exposure of 29.1 weeks and had 1 post-dose safety assessment. The majority of patients were female (63%) and median subject age was 50.5 years (ranging from 18-88 years of age). The racial and ethnic distribution was White (84%), Black (6%), Asian (6%) and Other (6%).

The most common adverse reactions (those occurring in ≥10% of patients) in the DOPTELET-treated patients across the pooled safety data from the four trials are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6: Adverse Reactions with a Frequency ≥10% in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia Treated with DOPTELET – Pooled Data from Clinical Trials

The incidence of serious adverse reactions was 9% (12/128) in the DOPTELET treatment group. Serious adverse reactions reported in more than 1 individual DOPTELET-treated patient included headache, occurring in 1.6% (2/128).

Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of DOPTELET that were reported in more than 1 patient included headache, occurring in 1.6% (2/128).

6.2 Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post approval use of DOPTELET. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.

Immune System Disorders: Hypersensitivity reactions including pruritus, rash, choking sensation, erythema, pharyngeal edema, pruritus generalized, rash macular, swelling face, and swollen tongue.

7.1 Effect of Other Drugs on DOPTELET in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Moderate or Strong Dual Inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4

Concomitant use with a moderate or strong dual inhibitor of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 increases avatrombopag AUC [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)], which may increase the risk of DOPTELET toxicities. Reduce the starting dosage of DOPTELET when used concomitantly with a moderate or strong dual inhibitor of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 (see Table 4) [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)].

In patients starting moderate or strong dual inhibitors of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 while receiving DOPTELET, monitor platelet counts and adjust DOPTELET dose as necessary (see Table 3) [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Moderate or Strong Dual Inducers of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4

Concomitant use with a moderate or strong dual inducer of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 decreases avatrombopag AUC [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)] which may reduce DOPTELET efficacy. Increase the recommended starting dosage of DOPTELET when used concomitantly with a moderate or strong dual inducer of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 (see Table 4) [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)].

In patients starting moderate or strong dual inducers of CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 while receiving DOPTELET, monitor platelet counts and adjust DOPTELET dose as necessary (see Table 3) [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

No dosage adjustments are required for patients with chronic liver disease.

8.1 Pregnancy

Risk Summary

Based on findings from animal reproduction studies, DOPTELET may cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman (see Data). The available data on DOPTELET in pregnant women are insufficient to inform a drug-associated risk of adverse developmental outcomes. In animal reproduction studies, oral administration of avatrombopag resulted in adverse developmental outcomes when administered during organogenesis in rabbits and during organogenesis and the lactation period in rats. However, these findings were observed at exposures based on an AUC substantially higher than the AUC observed in patients at the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg once daily. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.

The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and of miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.

Data

Animal Data

In embryo-fetal development studies, avatrombopag was administered during organogenesis at doses of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day in rats and doses of 100, 300, and 600 mg/kg/day in rabbits. Minimal decreases in fetal weights were observed in rats at the maternally toxic dose of 1000 mg/kg/day with exposures 190 times the human exposure based on AUC. Spontaneous abortions were observed at all doses tested in rabbits and were associated with decreased body weights and food consumption at 300 and 600 mg/kg/day; exposures at the lowest dose of 100 mg/kg/day were 10 times the AUC in patients at the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg once daily. There were no embryo-fetal effects in rats administered avatrombopag at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day (53 times the human exposure based on AUC) or rabbits administered avatrombopag at doses up to 600 mg/kg (35 times the human exposure based on AUC).

In pre- and postnatal development studies in rats, avatrombopag was administered during both the organogenesis and lactation periods at doses ranging from 5 to 600 mg/kg/day. Doses of 100, 300, and 600 mg/kg/day caused maternal toxicity leading to total litter losses, decreased body weight in pups, and increased pup mortality, with the majority of the pup mortality occurring from postnatal days 14 to 21. At a dose of 50 mg/kg/day that did not produce clear maternal toxicity, avatrombopag caused increased pup mortality from postnatal days 4 to 21, and mortality continued through postnatal day 25. The 50 mg/kg/day dose also decreased body weight gain in the pups, resulting in a delay in sexual maturation. There were no effects on behavioral or reproductive functions in the offspring. The 50 mg/kg/day dose resulted in maternal exposures 43 times and pup exposures approximately 3 times the AUC observed in patients at the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg once daily.

8.2 Lactation

Risk Summary

There is no information regarding the presence of avatrombopag in human milk, the effects on the breastfed child, or the effects on milk production. Avatrombopag was present in the milk of lactating rats. When a drug is present in animal milk, it is likely the drug will be present in human milk. Due to the potential for serious adverse reactions in a breastfed child from DOPTELET, breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment with DOPTELET and for at least 2 weeks after the last dose (see Clinical Considerations).

Clinical Considerations

Minimizing Exposure

A lactating woman receiving DOPTELET for brief periods, such as prior to an invasive procedure, should interrupt breastfeeding and pump and discard breastmilk during treatment and for two weeks after the last dose of DOPTELET in order to minimize exposure to a breastfed child. Advise lactating women receiving chronic DOPTELET therapy not to breastfeed during treatment with DOPTELET and for at least 2 weeks after the last dose.

8.4 Pediatric Use

Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.

In a 10-week juvenile toxicology study in rats, avatrombopag was administered at doses ranging from 20 to 300 mg/kg/day. There was no test article-related mortality and there were no clinical signs at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day. In the stomach, dose-dependent degeneration, regenerative hyperplasia, and atrophy of the glandular epithelium occurred at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day; exposures at 100 mg/kg/day in male rats were 14 times the AUC in patients at the highest recommended dose of 60 mg once daily. An increased incidence of background focal mineralization was also observed in the kidneys of females at 300 mg/kg/day (female rat exposure was 50 times the human exposure based on AUC at the 60 mg daily dose).

8.5 Geriatric Use

Clinical studies of DOPTELET did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects. Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients.

12.1 Mechanism of Action

Avatrombopag is an orally bioavailable, small molecule TPO receptor agonist that stimulates proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes from bone marrow progenitor cells, resulting in an increased production of platelets. Avatrombopag does not compete with TPO for binding to the TPO receptor and has an additive effect with TPO on platelet production.

12.2 Pharmacodynamics

Platelet Response

DOPTELET administered to adult patients resulted in dose- and exposure-dependent elevations in platelet counts. The onset of the platelet count increase was observed within 3 to 5 days of the start of treatment, with peak effect after 10 to 13 days. Post treatment, platelet counts decreased gradually, returning to near baseline values.

Cardiac Electrophysiology

At exposures similar to that achieved at the 40 mg and 60 mg dose, DOPTELET did not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent. Mean QTc prolongation effects >20 ms are not anticipated with the highest recommended therapeutic dosing regimen based on analysis of data from the pooled clinical trials in patients with chronic liver disease.

12.3 Pharmacokinetics

Avatrombopag demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics after single doses from 10 mg (0.5 times the lowest approved dosage) to 80 mg (1.3 times the highest recommended dosage). Healthy subjects administered 40 mg of avatrombopag had a geometric mean (%CV) maximal concentration (Cmax) of 166 (84%) ng/mL and area under the time-concentration curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) of 4198 (83%) ng.hr/mL. The pharmacokinetics of avatrombopag were similar in both healthy subjects and the chronic liver disease population.

Absorption

The median time to maximal concentration (Tmax) occurred at 5 to 6 hours post-dose.

Effect of Food

Avatrombopag AUC0-inf and Cmax were not affected when DOPTELET was co-administered with a low fat meal (500 calories, 3 g fat, 15 g protein, and 108 g carbohydrates) or a high fat meal (918 calories, 59 g fat, 39 g protein, and 59 g carbohydrates). The variability of avatrombopag exposure was reduced by 40% to 60% with food. The Tmax of avatrombopag was delayed by 0 to 2 hours when DOPTELET was administered with a low-fat or high-fat meal (median Tmax range 5 to 8 hours) compared to the fasted state.

Distribution

Avatrombopag has an estimated mean volume of distribution (%CV) of 180 L (25%). Avatrombopag is greater than 96% bound to human plasma proteins.

Elimination

The mean plasma elimination half-life (%CV) of avatrombopag is approximately 19 hours (19%). The mean (%CV) of the clearance of avatrombopag is estimated to be 6.9 L/hr (29%).

Metabolism

Avatrombopag is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 and CYP3A4.

Excretion

Fecal excretion accounted for 88% of the administered dose, with 34% of the dose excreted as unchanged avatrombopag. Only 6% of the administered dose was found in urine.

Specific Populations

Age (18-86 years), body weight (39-175 kg), sex, race [Whites, African-Americans, and East Asians (i.e., Japanese, Chinese and Koreans)], and any hepatic impairment (Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) grade A, B, and C, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score 4-23) and mild to moderate renal impairment (CLcr ≥30 mL/min) did not have clinically meaningful effects on the pharmacokinetics of avatrombopag.

The effect of age (<18 years) and severe renal impairment (CLcr <30 mL/min, Cockcroft-Gault) including patients requiring hemodialysis on avatrombopag pharmacokinetics is unknown.

Drug Interactions

Clinical Studies

Table 7 summarizes the effect of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of avatrombopag.

Table 7: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetics of Avatrombopag in the Presence of Co-Administered Drug

*at steady-state, except for cyclosporine which was administered as a single dose.

In Vitro Studies Where Drug Interaction Potential Was Not Further Evaluated Clinically

CYP enzymes: Avatrombopag does not inhibit CYP1A, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 or CYP3A, does not induce CYP1A, CYP2B6, CYP2C, or CYP3A, and weakly induces CYP2C8 and CYP2C9.

Transporter systems: Avatrombopag inhibits organic anion transporter (OAT) 3 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), but not organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 or 1B3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 or OAT1.

Avatrombopag is not a substrate for OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT2, OAT1 or OAT3.

12.5 Pharmacogenomics

The CYP2C9*2 and CYP2C9*3 loss-of-function polymorphisms result in reduced CYP2C9 enzymatic activity. In a pooled pharmacogenomic analysis of avatrombopag studies, subjects heterozygous for CYP2C9 loss-of-function polymorphisms (intermediate metabolizers [n=24]) had approximately 1.4-fold higher exposure and subjects homozygous for CYP2C9 loss-of-function polymorphisms (poor metabolizers [n=2]) had approximately 2-fold higher exposure compared to subjects wild-type for CYP2C9 (normal metabolizers [n=94]).

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

In two-year carcinogenicity studies, avatrombopag was administered orally at doses of 20, 60, and 160 mg/kg/day in mice and doses of 20, 50, and 160 mg/kg/day in rats. Avatrombopag induced a statistically significant increase in neuroendocrine cell (enterochromaffin-like cell, ECL cell) gastric tumors (carcinoids) in the stomach at 160 mg/kg in female rats. The 160 mg/kg/day dose resulted in exposures 117 times the AUC observed in patients at the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg once daily. The gastric carcinoids were considered likely due to prolonged hypergastrinemia observed in toxicity studies. Hypergastrinemia-related gastric carcinoids in rodents are generally considered to be of low risk or relevance to humans.

Avatrombopag was not mutagenic in an in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) assay or clastogenic in an in vitro human lymphocyte chromosomal aberrations assay or in an in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus assay.

Avatrombopag did not affect fertility or early embryonic development in male rats at exposures 22 times, or in female rats at exposures 114 times, the AUC observed in patients at the maximum recommended dose of 60 mg once daily.

14.1 Patients with Chronic Liver Disease

The efficacy of DOPTELET for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo a procedure was established in 2 identically-designed multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (ADAPT-1 [NCT01972529] and ADAPT-2 [NCT01976104]). In each trial, patients were assigned to the Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort (<40×109/L) or the High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort (≥40 to <50×109/L) based on their platelet count at baseline. Patients were then randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either DOPTELET or placebo. Patients were stratified according to hepatocellular cancer (HCC) status and risk of bleeding associated with the elective procedure (low, moderate, or high). Patients undergoing neurosurgical interventions, thoracotomy, laparotomy or organ resection were not eligible for enrollment.

Patients in the Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort received 60 mg DOPTELET or matching placebo once daily for 5 days, and patients in the High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort received 40 mg DOPTELET or matching placebo once daily for 5 days. Eligible patients were scheduled to undergo their procedure (low, moderate, or high bleeding risk) 5 to 8 days after their last dose of treatment. Patient populations were similar between the pooled Low and High Baseline Platelet Count Cohorts and consisted of 66% male and 35% female; median age 58 years and 61% White, 34% Asian, and 3% Black.

In ADAPT-1, a total of 231 patients were randomized, 149 patients were treated with DOPTELET and 82 patients were treated with placebo. In the Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the mean baseline platelet count for the DOPTELET-treated group was 31.1×109/L and for the placebo-treated patients was 30.7×109/L. In the High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the mean baseline platelet count for the DOPTELET-treated patients was 44.3×109/L and for placebo-treated patients was 44.9×109/L.

In ADAPT-2, a total of 204 patients were randomized, 128 patients were treated with DOPTELET and 76 patients were treated with placebo. In the Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the mean baseline platelet count for the DOPTELET-treated group was 32.7×109/L and for the placebo-treated patients was 32.5×109/L. In the High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort, the mean baseline platelet count for the DOPTELET-treated patients was 44.3×109/L and for the placebo-treated patients was 44.5×109/L.

Across both baseline platelet count cohorts and the avatrombopag and placebo treatment groups, patients underwent a broad spectrum of types of scheduled procedures that ranged from low to high bleeding risk. Overall, the majority of patients (60.8% [248/430] subjects) in all treatment groups underwent low bleeding risk procedures, 17.2% (70/430) of patients underwent procedures associated with moderate bleeding risk, and 22.1% (90/430) of subjects underwent procedures associated with high bleeding risk. The proportions of patients undergoing low, moderate, and high-risk procedures were similar between the avatrombopag and placebo treatment groups.

The major efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who did not require a platelet transfusion or any rescue procedure for bleeding after randomization and up to 7 days following an elective procedure. Additional secondary efficacy outcomes were the proportion of patients who achieved platelet counts of >50×109/L on the day of procedure, and the change in platelet count from baseline to procedure day.

Responders were defined as patients who did not require a platelet transfusion or any rescue procedure for bleeding after randomization and up to 7 days following a scheduled procedure. The following were considered rescue therapies to manage the risk of bleeding associated with a procedure: whole blood transfusion, packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, platelet transfusion, fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or cryoprecipitate administration, Vitamin K, desmopressin, recombinant activated factor VII, aminocaproic acid, tranexamic acid, or surgical or interventional radiology procedures performed to achieve hemostasis and control blood loss. In both baseline platelet count cohorts, patients in the DOPTELET treatment groups had a greater proportion of responders than the corresponding placebo treatment groups that was both clinically meaningful and statistically significant as detailed in Table 8.

Table 8: Proportion of Patients Not Requiring a Platelet Transfusion or Any Rescue Procedure for Bleeding by Baseline Platelet Count Cohort and Treatment Group – ADAPT-1 and ADAPT-2

1. Two-sided 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation.
   
2. Difference of Proportion vs. placebo = Proportion of Responders for DOPTELET – Proportion of Responders for placebo.
   
3. 95% confidence interval calculated based on normal approximation.
   
4. By Cohhran-Mantel-Haenszel Testing stratified by bleeding risk for the procedure.

In addition, both trials demonstrated a higher proportion of patients who achieved the target platelet count of ≥50×109/L on the day of procedure, a secondary efficacy endpoint, in both DOPTELET-treated groups versus the placebo-treated groups for both cohorts (Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort – ADAPT-1: 69% vs 4%, respectively; p˂0.0001, ADAPT-2: 67% vs 7%, respectively; p <0.0001; High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort – ADAPT-1: 88% vs 21%, respectively; p <0.0001: ADAPT-2: 93% vs 39%, respectively; p <0.0001). Further, both trials demonstrated a greater mean change in platelet counts from baseline to the day of the procedure, a secondary efficacy endpoint, in both DOPTELET-treated groups versus the placebo-treated groups for both cohorts (Low Baseline Platelet Count Cohort – ADAPT-1: 32×109/L vs 0.8×109/L, respectively; p<0.0001; ADAPT-2: 31.3×109/L vs 3.0×109/L, respectively; p <0.0001; High Baseline Platelet Count Cohort – ADAPT-1: 37.1×109/L vs 1.0×109/L, respectively; p <0.0001; ADAPT-2: 44.9×109/L vs 5.9×109/L, respectively; p <0.0001).

A measured increase in platelet counts was observed in both DOPTELET treatment groups over time beginning on Day 4 post-dose, that peaked on Day 10-13, decreased 7 days post-procedure, and then returned to near baseline values by Day 35.

14.2 Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial

The efficacy of DOPTELET in adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia was evaluated in a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT01438840). Patients had previously received one or more prior chronic immune thrombocytopenia therapies and had an average of screening and baseline platelet counts <30×109/L. Patients were centrally stratified by splenectomy status, baseline platelet count (≤15×109/L or >15×109/L to <30×109/L), and use of concomitant chronic immune thrombocytopenia medication, and then randomized (2:1) to receive either DOPTELET or placebo for 6 months. Patients received a starting dose of 20 mg once daily, with doses subsequently titrated based on platelet response.

Forty-nine patients were randomized, 32 to DOPTELET and 17 to placebo, with similar mean [SD] baseline platelet counts in the 2 treatment groups (14.1 [8.6]×109/L and 12.7 [7.8]×109/L, respectively). The median age was 44 years, 63% were female, and 94% were Caucasian, 4% Asian and 2% Black. The median duration of exposure was 26 weeks for DOPTELET-treated patients and 6 weeks for placebo-treated patients. The major efficacy outcome in this trial was the cumulative number of weeks in which the platelet count was ≥50×109/L during the 6-month treatment period in the absence of rescue therapy. DOPTELET-treated patients had a longer duration of platelet counts ≥50×109/L in the absence of rescue therapy than those who received placebo (median 12.4 [0, 25] vs 0 [0, 2] weeks, respectively, p<0.0001) (see Table 9).

Table 9: Cumulative Number of Weeks of Platelet Response – Phase 3 Trial in Patients with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia

Max=maximum, Min=minimum, SD=Standard deviation.

*Cumulative number of weeks of platelet response is defined as the total numbers of weeks in which the platelet count was ≥50×109/L during 6 months of treatment in the absence of rescue therapy.

In addition, a larger proportion of patients in the DOPTELET treatment group had platelet counts ≥50×109/L at Day 8 compared to placebo (21/32; 66% vs 0/17; 0.0%, respectively; p<0.0001).