Weight loss: Calorie counting as effective as time-restricted eating

Evan Walker
Evan Walker TheMediTary.Com |
A person prepares a salad with avocado, bananas, and blueberriesShare on Pinterest
Experts say the quality of the calories you consume is the most important part of a diet. Oscar Wong/Getty Images
  • Researchers from Johns Hopkins University in Maryland report that time-restricted eating and calorie counting lead to similar weight loss results.
  • The study suggests time-restricted eating naturally results in a reduction of about 200 to 550 calories per day.
  • Experts say this eating pattern can work well for some people, but the quality and quantity of what you eat still matters most.

The weight loss results of time-restricted eating are nearly identical to traditional calorie counting, according to a study from Johns Hopkins University in Maryland published today in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Time-restricted eating is a dieting method that defines which hours of the day a person consumes daily calories. Also known as intermittent fasting, popular fasting schedules include 16:8 (fasting for 16 hours, eating in an 8-hour window), or the once-weekly 24-hour fast while following a relaxed eating schedule throughout the rest of the week.

Specific calorie counting is generally not part of time-restricted eating.

Past research and promoters of time-restricted eating have stated this diet pattern improves longevity, encourages weight loss through nutritional ketosis, decreases the risk of various diseases, and improves cognition.

“The findings of the study that the Health benefits of intermittent fasting are solely due to calorie restriction completely supports my own opinion,” Dr. Julie Manasseh, a specialist in obesity medicine at Weight Journey: Medical Weight Loss who was not involved in the study, told Medical News Today.

While she supports intermittent fasting as a method for weight loss, Manasseh says the benefits seen in research are the results of the weight loss itself, not fasting. Other experts agree with her assessment.

“It’s hard to say if I fully agree with the conclusion of this recent study or not,” explained Shetal Desai Rautela, a registered dietitian and owner of Diabetes & Lifestyle Care.

Rautela, who was not involved in the research, suggested using caution before buying into any particular diet or nutrition study.

“As a professional in the field of nutrition, it’s extremely important to keep up with recent research,” Rautela told Medical News Today. “The American Heart Association (AHA) recently published the results of a study with 20,000 participants showing that early time-restricted feeding, that common 16:8 schedule, was directly related to a 91 percent increased risk of cardiovascular death.”

Some experts criticized the AHA’s report. In addition, another recent study published in 2023 by the Endocrine Society concluded nearly the opposite — stating that a 16:8 fasting schedule improved glucose levels and cardiometabolic health.

“Overall, what matters is what helps one lose weight safely,” said Rautela, suggesting those considering fasting should have a thoughtful discussion with their healthcare provider first.

“Intermittent fasting can be difficult to keep up with day-in and day-out, both physiologically and practically,” said Rautela.

“Any sort of caloric restriction will always provide initial results for a person trying to lose weight,” said Rautela. “The higher the weight loss goal, the faster the initial weight loss will be on the scale. But is it sustainable?”

“For some people, if any diet feels too forced, restrictive, and difficult to sustain, then it’s likely not worth the effort,” cautioned Rautela, adding that it may still improve your relationship with your body’s natural hunger pangs.

Hunger cues and ideal eating patterns also vary from one person to the next.

“I have patients who never eat breakfast because they just don’t feel hungry early in the morning,” explained Manasseh. “For these patients, I advise them to continue not eating breakfast and just have lunch and dinner when they are hungry. These patients are following a fasting schedule, but it suits them because it fits with the pattern of their internal hunger cues.”

“Culturally, we’re constantly surrounded by food,” said Rautela, adding that following a fasting schedule has helped some of her clients re-learn how to recognize genuine hunger cues.

Rautela said she tries to embrace her clients’ enthusiasm for any nutrition or weight loss approach.

“If they’re eager to try something, it shows they care about their health and want to explore it further,” she explained. “My job is to build their knowledge base so they are empowered to make the right and safe decision with support from their healthcare team.”

Like Rautel, Manasseh said mindless eating when you’re not actually hungry is a consistent challenge that fasting can help address.

“Emotional eating and stress eating, or excessive alcohol consumption, are also major factors for the majority of my patients,” said Manasseh. “This needs to be addressed.”

Manasseh and Rautela both expressed the importance of helping each individual develop an approach to nutrition that suits their goals, habits, lifestyle, and personality.

“I start with the patient’s normal diet and help them make improvements to reduce calories while ensuring it’s sustainable long-term,” said Manasseh. “Providing regular support and accountability with progress visits is critical to their success.”

“Over the years, I’ve moved away from a one-size-fits-all approach,” added Rautela. “I’ve seen the most weight loss success with clients when we have frequent check-ins to work through challenges and behaviors while identifying their progress.”

Losing the weight, of course, is only step one. Maintaining it comes next.

“The door never closes when it comes to maintaining your weight loss,” said Rautela. “But that’s a whole different story.”

Share this Article