Weight loss: New drug may lower harmful fat avoiding muscle loss

Evan Walker
Evan Walker TheMediTary.Com |
A collage showing fat cells and people walking outside.Share on Pinterest
Experimental drug could reduce harmful liver and visceral fat, without significant muscle loss. Image credit: MNT Design/Photo by Mariia Vitkovska/Schankz/Getty Images
  • In the phase 3 SYNCHRONIZE-1 trial, participants with obesity or overweight treated with Survodutide achieved up to 16.6% mean weight loss over 76 weeks.
  • New analyses showed Survodutide reduced visceral fat by up to 34% and liver fat by up to 63.1%, suggesting benefits beyond overall weight reduction.
  • The majority of weight loss came from fat mass, with analyses indicating that lean body mass was largely maintained.
  • In people with obesity or overweight and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), around 60% of participants achieved normalization of liver fat levels.

Although newer obesity medications have transformed weight management, weight loss alone may not fully capture improvements in health.

For example, the medications may aim to help with fat loss, but growing evidence suggests that weight loss drugs may also reduce skeletal muscle mass, which could lead to adverse effects, such as sarcopenic obesity.

Excess visceral fat, or fat stored around internal abdominal organs, is likely associated with insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes.

Fat accumulation in the liver is also linked with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer.

Survodutide is a dual glucagon and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist, developed by biopharmaceutical company Boehringer Ingelheim.

By also activating glucagon receptors, the drug aims to increase energy expenditure and influence fat metabolism, while still reducing appetite and food intake. As such, the drug may produce broader metabolic benefits than weight loss alone.

Now, new phase 3 clinical trial data presented at the 2026 American Diabetes Association (ADA) Scientific Sessions, suggest that the once-weekly experimental obesity treatment can not only reduce body weight but also visceral fat and liver fat.

The findings come from analyses of the phase 3 SYNCHRONIZE-1 obesity trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), and the phase 3 SYNCHRONIZE-MASLD trial, published in Nature Medicine.

The 76-week phase 3 SYNCHRONIZE-1 trial evaluated Survodutide in 725 adults with obesity or overweight, without type 2 diabetes.

Participants received a weekly injection of Survodutide at either a 3.6 milligram (mg) or 6mg dose, or placebo.

The results show substantial and sustained weight loss, with participants using Survodutide losing up to 16.6% of body weight, without compromising muscle mass, compared with 3.2% in the placebo group.

In a sub-study of the trial involving individuals who provided MRI measurements at baseline and at the end of the study, the results show reductions in visceral fat of up to 34%, and that lean mass accounted for no more than a 10.8% change in total tissue mass, indicating that weight loss was primarily driven by reductions in fat mass.

Carel le Roux, MBChB, FRCP, FRCPath, PhD, Professor at University College in Dublin, Ireland, and Global Coordinating Investigator of the SYNCHRONIZE-1 trial, spoke to Medical News Today about the findings.

“The most important finding from SYNCHRONIZE-1 was the evidence of targeted weight loss, with substantial reductions in metabolically harmful visceral and liver fat alongside preservation of lean mass, highlighting survodutide’s potential to improve broader metabolic Health.”

– Carel le Roux, MBChB, FRCP, FRCPath, PhD

“While survodutide demonstrated statistically significant and sustained weight loss over 76 weeks – with up to 16.6% average weight loss versus 3.2% with placebo – the MRI substudy provided important insight into how this weight loss was achieved,” added le Roux.

“The data showed that weight reduction was driven predominantly by fat mass loss, with lean mass accounting for only a small proportion of total tissue mass change. In particular, survodutide reduced visceral fat by up to 34% and liver fat by up to 63.1%, suggesting the potential to address key drivers of metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity,” he detailed.

MASLD is closely tied to metabolic Health, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and is estimated to affect roughly 1 in 3 adults. While standard GLP-1 drugs can help treat MASLD, dual glucagon and GLP‐1 receptor agonist drugs such as Survodutide may offer a more effective option.

However, direct comparisons between Survodutide and other obesity medications have not been conducted in head-to-head trials, making it difficult to determine which therapy is superior.

“Survodutide’s dual glucagon and GLP-1 receptor agonism is designed to address obesity and metabolic dysfunction through complementary mechanisms,” le Roux told MNT. “Its GLP-1 activity helps reduce appetite while increasing fullness and satiety, supporting sustained weight loss.”

“At the same time, the glucagon component is thought to directly impact the liver and metabolic pathways involved in hepatic fat metabolism,” he added. “Based on preclinical and clinical evidence to date, the glucagon agonism may contribute to reductions in liver fat, improvements in metabolic regulation, and potentially inflammation and fibrosis-related pathways.”

“This mechanism is aligned with the reductions in visceral and hepatic fat observed in the SYNCHRONIZE-1 MRI substudy. We think this liver-directed component is an important differentiator for survodutide,” le Roux explained.

“While currently available GLP-1-based treatments primarily focus on appetite regulation and weight reduction, survodutide’s dual agonism is specifically designed to directly impact the liver — a key regulator of metabolic function,” he detailed.

“However, any comparisons with other therapies should be made cautiously, as cross-trial comparisons are limited by differences in study designs, populations, and endpoints,” the researcher pointed out.

TAGGED: ,
Share this Article